Modernizing Shakespeare is a time-honored tradition, but it often seems more
generic than genuine. The reason that Shakespeares plays remain popular is because of their relevancy despite the 400 years separating their origins from today. So for Ralph Fiennes to take Coriolanusabout a disgraced Roman general who joins the enemy against his countryfrom its ancient setting to the war-ravaged present is an unfortunate reaction against the complexity of the language and the obscurity of the plot and setting to contemporary audiences.
Shakespeares Gaius Martius, a military man through and through, is a Roman general with little thoughtand even less usefor the ordinary people. His first appearance in the play, during a confrontation with rioting Roman citizens who want food from nearby stores of grain, shows his naked contempt for those not his comrades in arms. When he later returns to Rome a hero after successfully fending off the advance of the hated Volscian army, hes talked into running for the office of consul by his controlling mother, Volumnia, and the friendly senator Menenius, who has bestowed on him the honored title of Coriolanus.
But Coriolanus is no politician. He is unable to fake compassion for the citizenry, and when he is again confronted by (to his ears) insolent rabble-rousers from the public and the senate, he loses his temper and calls them out, bemoaning that its allowed for crows to peck the eagles. Needless to say, popular support turns against him and he is banished. In a rage, he offers himself to the Volscians, with whom he joins to attack Rome and gain his revenge.
In Fiennes film, ancient Rome has become an unnamed contemporary nation. The atrocities of the Bosnian war are recalled in this production that was shot in Serbia. Its no earth-shattering revelation that a play written four centuries ago about a general who lived two thousand years earlier is relevant to our tenuous times: historyand artrepeats itself. But trying to make every aspect of Coriolanus recognizable, if not meaningful, to those who would never be caught dead watching, attending, or reading Shakespeare, forces Fiennes into a dramatic and thematic corner.
As director, Fiennes makes expressive use of Serbian locations, which still bear scars of the murderous warring among political and religious factions. But the use of modern technologyaround-the-clock TV news networks show the ongoing battles and help explain whos who and whats what for a presumably unfamiliar audienceundercuts Shakespeares dialogue, notably when Volumnia and Virgilia, Coriolanus’s faithful wife, wait desperately for news of him. All they need to do is turn on the TV, instead of waiting to hear from Menenius for news. And when Volumnia later tells Menenius that Coriolanus was wounded but recovering, why wouldnt he already have known that through the 24/7 news cycle?
Fiennes helms gritty battle sequences in the shaky hand-held style of Full Metal Jacket and Saving Private Ryan, apparently to appease those who might wander in hoping for gory combat. When Coriolanus searches door to door for hidden enemies (would a general, no matter how reckless, do such a thing alone?) and vanquishes a surprise attacker, his shiny bald head becomes caked in blood, a visceral image that substitutes Shakespeares complexity for mere black and white.
But the ultimate clash between Fiennes and screenwriter John Logans modern sensibility and Shakespeare is the mano-a-mano fight between Coriolanus and the Volscian leader, Aufidius. Both armies are equipped with automatic weapons, but when these two men begin their brawl, they put down the modern weaponry and unsheathe glistening knives before joining the battle. In another nod to mindless movie violence, they crash through a plate glass window and fall two stories into a dumpster: unbloodied and unbowed (and with no broken bones, apparently), they must be physically separated by their allies.
Brian Cox (Menenius), Gerard Butler (Aufidius) and Jessica Chastain (Virgilia) make solid contributions, while Vanessa Redgrave takes the scenery-chewing role of Volumnia and turns it into a tour de force more powerful because of her restraint. Fiennes Coriolanus, an equally strong screen presence, is able to make us sympathetic toward this fatally prideful man, effortlessly making Shakespeares words sound conversational even when hes confrontational. His spiteful pronunciation of boy, spat out at the Volscians, leads to a tremendously emotional climax.
But its too bad that Fiennes didnt trust Shakespeare more often. His concerns are still ours,
but making them obvious doesnt make them any clearer.
Leave A Comment